Sep
5th

Education and Change

Filed under Teacher | Posted by Saphrym

I have another school assignment that I just wrote for a class that I’m going to share with you guys. I hope you enjoy these. When I enjoy writing the assignment, I like sharing them with you.

Is change always good and necessary? Why or why not?

The answer to this question depends on the context of the change. If we’re speaking of education, which I’m assuming we are, it also depends on the change itself. Not all changes are good. Not all changes are bad.

For example, the original concept of education in Colonial times was to teach the Bible, and that was about it. No science; no other history; nothing but the Bible. If that was the way education was still today, we wouldn’t have made the advances we’ve made. But even those advances can be separated into good and bad. Sure, the medical advances help save human lives. That’s great. However, warfare advances have helped destroy human lives; not so great. So was the change in education from the Colonial times good or bad or even necessary? It’s all very subjective.

And no change is truly necessary. It’s like the old saying goes, “Nothing is certain but death and taxes.” But to be honest, not even taxes are certain. There is nothing is this world that any one person must do except die and live until they die. That’s it. They have to suffer the consequences of their actions, but they may choose any action or “non-action” they wish. Same goes for change or the choice of change. But if we’re talking about consequences, the consequences of not changing from the Colonial period’s way of thinking about education would have meant less knowledge. Again, is that good or bad? We have Amish out here who would say it’s neither.

But in the pursuit of education, anything that changes the way we educate in a positive way is good and necessary, as long as the final goal is to educate our students as much as possible, which as teachers, that is our final goal. On the contrary, anything that changes the way we educate in a negative way is bad and necessary to avoid. But again, it’s very subjective.

For instance, No Child Left Behind is viewed by some as a bad thing as it has made teaching into a profession that focuses on preparing students for tests. But it’s good because it holds schools accountable for their educational systems. As I told my daughter today, decisions about anything (including change) should be made by weighing the pros and cons of those decisions and ranking them based on importance. For example:

NCLB

Pros:

Holds schools accountable – 9
Supposedly helps to provide equal funding for schools – 8

Cons:

Causes “teaching to the test” syndrome which is not a truly educational experience – 10
Doesn’t always keep it’s promises for funds – 8

9+8 = 17

10+8 = 18

The cons win in this example, but by a small margin, which means more qualities need to be discussed and weighed.1

How can teachers positively impact change?

Embrace the positive and fight the negative. I was just telling my wife that if a decision is made that negatively impacts your ability to educate your students, something needs to be done. People need to be told about the problems. Parents need to be involved in the decisions.

However, if the change is positive, embrace it and don’t be scared about it. A recent change would be the introduction of technology.2 Many teachers, to this day, can’t stand using technology. But it is a change that has allowed education to be tripled in efficiency and with further improvements, that will increase. It is a positive change in the context of education. It is a necessary change in the same context.

So I’d say a teacher should embrace the positive changes. They should take PD courses to improve their knowledge of the new methods and technology available. The tools and methods available to teachers are constantly evolving, and just like other professional occupations3, teachers need to evolve right along with them.

  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • Mixx
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  1. And of course, that is purely a hypothetical example. *cough* [«]
  2. Recent in terms of life of the country, that is. [«]
  3. such as doctor, lawyer, computer programmer, understanding what a KVM switch is, etc. [«]


2 Responses to “Education and Change”

  1. By lvs on Sep 16, 2008 | Reply to this comment

    I loved this commentary that you have written about education and change.

    I didnt know they only taught the bible in earlier times? Are you sure? Surely they would have taught things like counting, civics, geography, economics, etc. It could have been basic but I am sure they would have covered some of it?

    You have said teachers should embrace positive attitudes. However, the positive is not always obvious. Take the collider experiment. Some teachers have taken it to be negative others as positive. Who is right?

    Similarly do you know that industrialization was accelerated after the second world war because technologies developed for it now began to be used in everyday life.

    Finally, I would request you to read my latest article which is on education. I will value any comments that you may have.

    Most recent blog post from lvs: IT Education In Need of a Reboot


  2. By Saphrym on Sep 16, 2008 | Reply to this comment

    @lvs: They taught more than the bible. But everything was taught from a religious point of view. When I say attitudes, I means they should be positive about being a teacher. Taking opinionated stances is an entirely different matter that requires much research on the part of the teacher so they can fully understand BOTH sides of an argument. And yeah, technology is always advanced by war and NASA. ;)


Post a Comment

CommentLuv Enabled